Earlier this year, the Army opened three more posts to women in infantry occupational specialties at Fort Campbell, Kentucky; Fort Carson, Colorado; and Fort Bliss, Texas, for a total of five bases open to women in combat roles.
It was handled according to Army Regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice—the standard—and the company moved on, learning and rebuilding trust as we went.
What was, at times, was the ability of their male peers to accept them. The solution has been to assign women to units in pairs, which means they subsequently leave in pairs, creating assignment and stability constraints for the units.
The solution to these problems is to create appropriate, realistic, age- and gender-neutral standards for combat arms—not to ban any entire demographic group because there is a weak standard in place.
Regardless of these challenges, the integration of women continues to be the official policy of the DoD. Women serving in integrated units will suffer higher injury rates as a result of this. In addition, any modifications to performance standards can create the perception that women are not meeting the same expectations as their male counterparts.
Some people, regardless of gender, handle the strain of combat and training better than others. Navy and Air Force The Navy and Air Force are further removed from infantry and direct combat, and both services have been more flexible regarding the assignment of women.
PROS Overview: My personal experience has been that the principles of leadership and team building apply equally to women as to men. Advertisement The Army assigns women to these specialties anyway. In terms of reflexes and reaction timesmen significantly outperform women. To me, this demonstrates that gender-neutral standards work.