Although Richard is involved with deception, plotting and murder even against his own family the audience does not feel hatred towards the Machiavellian villain an important feature of both texts that is necessary for the success of both texts.
He aimed to charm and entertain the audience through language and the discussion of relevant issues surrounding morality, conscience and deceit. When trying to appeal to their respective audiences, the way in which this power is shown is very different, as even though the theme of power is constant, the ways in which it are seen and embodied in society is largely a product of the times.
This function, however, is not in balance; patriarchy weakens the former and a customary appreciation of determinism strengthens the latter.
Author: Brandon Johnson. However, each presents a different perspective as to the nature of power; its origins and morality. Any sympathy elicited from the audience is undermined by the thick irony in the dialogue.
Through the comparative study of these texts our understanding of different contexts and values are illuminated. A greatly diminished and altered portrayal of Margaret, the primary instrument of determinism in the play, is expressive of this.
Instead Pacino focuses on the idea that King Richard is not fit for power as he used villainous methods and deception in its attainment. Any subject.
The themes of duplicity and moral complexity evident throughout King Richard III can be found in contemporary society through political figures seeking power by any means regardless of consequence. Already a member?
The religious and philosophical paradigms that fabricate society change over time; however, the themes addressed by Shakespeare and Pacino have effectively transcended generations to be relevant to both audiences.
Influenced by shifting components of cultural and historical contexts, a difference may be perceived in the professed relationship between the two.