The focus on the topic of prejudice in the book the 12 angry men

However, at the end of the play, there is a chilling reversal, as all of the jurors switch their vote to "not guilty," except for 3rd Juror, at which point 8th Juror points out, "It's eleven to one Then Juror 9, after seeing Juror 4 rub his nose which is being irritated by his eye glassesrealizes that, like Juror 4, the woman who allegedly saw the murder had impressions in the sides of her nose which she rubbed, indicating that she wore glasses, but did not wear them to court out of vanity.

It could be New York.

12 angry men character analysis

How often theme appears:. We leave the play with a sense that justice and right has prevailed over irrationality and prejudice, but, pointedly so, we never actually find out the truth.

His vote annoys the other jurors, especially Juror 7 Jack Wardenwho has tickets to a baseball game that evening; and Juror 10 Ed Begley Sr.

12 angry men essay

In the movie 12 Angry Men, the story of a trial with a jury of varying backgrounds and beliefs, justice is a theme at the forefront. I had even debated watching the remake, particularly because it was not in color. A boy that could be looked on as guilty from the word go, is put up to the jury to decide his fait. Then Juror 9, after seeing Juror 4 rub his nose which is being irritated by his eye glasses , realizes that, like Juror 4, the woman who allegedly saw the murder had impressions in the sides of her nose which she rubbed, indicating that she wore glasses, but did not wear them to court out of vanity. The play begins with a judge explaining to the jurors their job and how in order for the boy to be sent to death the vote must be unanimous. The characters are a cross-section of professions, classes, ages, and immigrant status, whose differences inform how… Justice As a play portraying the deliberations of a jury in a murder trial, Twelve Angry Men is naturally concerned with the idea of justice. Juror 3 shouts "I'll kill him! Now sit down and don't open your mouth again. I know it. The result is that 3rd Juror is immediately prejudiced against him. The lack of equality brings about other elements of justice to make up for and build upon it. The play juxtaposes a presumably wealthy stock broker 4th Juror with someone who has admittedly lived in the slums his entire life 5th Juror , and we seem to have every level of working man in between. This relationship becomes very important in how 3rd Juror and 8th Juror understand the accused. It is immediately apparent that the jurors have already decided that the boy is guilty, and that they plan to return their verdict without taking time for discussion with the sole exception of Juror 8 Henry Fonda , who is the only "not guilty" vote in a preliminary tally. Ignoring the opening stage directions, there are no indications of time and place, except that it is summer and the fact that the play is all men - which does date it, but even that can and has frequently been changed in production.

However, as they get to know each other and realize the ways in which the evidence may not add up, it is also notable how they are forced — at least within that jury room — to temporarily see past their prejudices. McCardle exchange names, and all of the jurors descend the courthouse steps to return to their individual lives I know it.

juror 10 prejudice

In fact, 8th is the only juror to carefully review specific details from the case rather than resorting to general class stereotypes. Juror 8 then mentions the man's second claim: upon hearing the father's body hit the floor, he had run to the door of his apartment and seen the defendant running out of the building from his front door in 15 seconds.

In the movie 12 Angry Men, the story of a trial with a jury of varying backgrounds and beliefs, justice is a theme at the forefront.

The focus on the topic of prejudice in the book the 12 angry men
Rated 8/10 based on 94 review
Download
12 Angry Men ()